Monday, April 21, 2014

Making Decisions & God's Sovereignty

I found this quote about making decisions and understanding God's will. I have done some studying in this area with regard to the idea that there are two wills of God, called different things by different folks. I have mostly understood it as God's Moral will versus His Sovereign will. In regard to living our lives trying to be "in the will of God", we are given guidelines in His moral, but we are not given an indication, beforehand, of His Sovereign will. DB

"We should not be concerned with the sovereign will of God when we face a decision (except that we need to be ready to accept whatever the Lord has planned)

The guidance we need for our choices does not have to be somehow mined from the mysterious and unknowable plan devised among the Holy Trinity in eternity past. Rather it is a relatively simple process of finding out what the Bible says and doing it." Dave Swavley

Monday, April 14, 2014

Music Monday: Beatles- Abbey Road

To mark the 44th anniversary of the breakup of the Beatles today, high schooler Dylan Gardner recorded 15 seconds of every song from the second side of Abbey Road, the final album the band recorded. HT 22 Words.

Friday, April 04, 2014

The culture around us is dying: Supplemental

The previous post is linked: here.

Over the past few years, different states’ highway agencies have, according to apparent federal guidelines, been introducing changes to road signs with the aim of making them easier to read or understand (and with the cost of your tax dollars).  So, are these new road signs absolutely easier to read or understand?  Nope.  For instance, the Clearview font with its combination of majuscule and miniscule letters simply is not easier to read than road signs that use only capital letters; for there is a difference between all-caps in a road sign and all-caps in an indemnity section of a service agreement that you read on a computer screen.  This is yet another example of what the movers and shakers of our society do today: they possess a horrible tendency to make changes that are nothing less than wasteful, counterproductive and foolish.

Tomorrow’s movers and shakers are today’s  high school students.  I understand that teenagers are not as wise, smart, and sophisticated as they think they are; I understand that better than most since I was an introspective, observant semi-contrarian even in junior high.  Still, the actions of the first group of students in the following news item are ridiculous by any standard; hat tip to a certain trucker: Furor at Catholic high school after nun presents Church teaching on homosexuality |

The silver lining of this cloud is the separation of the tares from the wheat, as it were.

Thursday, April 03, 2014

OkCupid: Save the Date

On 3 April 2014 Reuters ran the story that, well, «"Mozilla's new CEO, Brendan Eich, is an opponent of equal rights for gay couples," the message said. "We would therefore prefer that our users not use Mozilla software to access OkCupid."»

So let’s all check back with the staff of OkCupid in five years, after the movement for equal rights of those wanting group marriages or marriages with siblings or with inhuman entities has gained ground and become as strident as the Gay Lobby is.  Should it be discovered that OkCupid is equally old-fashioned and hateful in their dealings with the hyper-celebrated social groups of the next zeitgeist, some of us will remember OkCupid’s hypocrisy and what they did to Mozilla back in 2014.

And now that you are done reading this blog post, go out and find yet another Web browser--besides either IE, Chrome, Safari, Firefox, or any other popular one--to use because one thing is certain: there are one or two employees who developed those browsers yet are sexist in their use of insults and slurs; the same people are also unwittingly prejudicial and/or needlessly insulting in their thoughts and dealings with conservatives, Republicans, Southerners, country folk, gun owners, Christians, Muslims, Jews, and really practically any other social group.  (I could pull contemporary anecdotes to support what I am saying here.)  Go ahead and think about drawing up a new Constitution for the United States while you’re at it; freedom of speech per the First Amendment derives from a document written by racist slave owners anyhow.

Monday, March 31, 2014

Burning Away Misconceptions about "Holy Fire"

Lyndon Unger over at The Cripplegate does a good job of accumulating a massive amount of links to probably anytime the word or concept of fire is used in the Bible. This is in response to the idea that some churches pray or sing to ask God to send His Fire! When we compare that idea of fire to the Biblical use of the word, it appears that it may not be good to call God's fire down. Here you go:

If you weren’t born into a Christian home and came to know the Lord a little later in life, you may remember your first experiences with “Christian Culture”.  You discovered a whole bunch of bands that you’d never heard of, a whole new realm of celebrities, and a bunch of strange new language.  Words that used to be somewhat acceptable were now taboo (i.e. certain terms associated with the bathroom), words that you never heard previously became part of your vocabulary (i.e. “Calvinism” or “eschatology”), and words that used to mean one thing now meant something else entirely (i.e. “charismatic” or “world”).testamintsIf you entered the faith via a Charismatic church (like me), one of the most quickly re-defined terms was “fire”.  “Fire” used to be what you called the results of tossing a match on something flammable, or maybe something you did with a gun.  Now it meant something way different.In Charismatic circles, there is often talk about “fire” of some sort: Holy Fire, Divine Fire, Heavenly Fire, the Fire of God, etc.  The idea of “fire” is basically paralleled with one or more of the following ideas: spiritual passion, having an emotionally intense worship/church service, really “getting serious” with God (or some form of personal revival), or some sort of outpouring of divine power on a person/church meeting/event resulting in a renewed passion of some sort (i.e. evangelism) or various “manifestations” of the Holy Spirit (i.e. euphoria, tongues, healings, prophecies, “miracles”, holy laughter, holy glue, holy vomiting, barking, crying, being slain/laid out in the spirit, visions, trances, screaming, physical pain, teleportation, etc.).
I had generally gone along with the Charismatic usage of the term “fire” with regards to passion or zeal, and not really questioned it since the term is often used in non-Charismatic circles in nearly identical ways. But, as I’ve grown in my knowledge of the Lord and his word I’ve found myself continually questioning my own assumptions and understandings and going “back to the drawing board”.  When we speak of “fire” in the previously mentioned ways, are we using the term in a proper Biblical sense?bible-studyThere’s only one real way to objectively answer the question.  Let’s plug through all 430 occurrences of “fire” in the ESV (and let’s be honest: most people who use the term aren’t doing original language exegesis):
1. There are many references to physical fire (the kind that firefighters need to put out) in the Scripture:
Genesis 22:6-7Exodus 12:822:627:329:1429:3432:20,32:3435:338:3Leviticus 1:7-81:121:172:143:54:12,6:9-106:12-136:307:177:198:178:329:1110:1,13:5213:5513:5716:12-1316:2719:620:1421:9;Numbers 3:44:146:1816:716:1816:3716:4618:919:626:6131:1031:23Deuteronomy 7:57:259:2112:312:3113:16Joshua 6:247:157:258:88:1911:611:911:1113:14Judges 1:86:219:159:209:499:5212:114:1515:5-615:1416:1918:2720:481 Samuel 2:2830:130:330:142 Samuel 14:30-3122:922:1323:71 Kings 7:509:1616:1818:2318:24-2519:122 Kings 1:148:1217:3119:1823:1125:152 Chronicles 4:2216:1421:1935:1336:19;Nehemiah 1:32:32:13Job 22:2028:531:1241:19Psalm 11:618:818:12-1321:946:968:1274:778:6380:16,83:14118:12140:10148:8Proverbs 6:2726:1826:20-21,30:16Isaiah 1:75:247:49:59:1910:1627:1130:14,30:3333:1237:1944:15-1644:1947:1454:1664:264:1166:24Jeremiah 6:297:187:3119:522:729:2232:2934:234:2236:2236:2336:3237:837:1038:1738:2343:12-1349:251:3251:5852:19Ezekiel 1:41:131:27,5:28:210:610:715:4-616:2120:3122:2023:25,24:1024:1228:1428:1630:830:1430:1638:2239:9-10, ; Daniel 3:223:24-277:9-11Hosea 7:4Joel 2:30Micah 1:4;Nahum 1:6Zechariah 9:4Malachi 1:103:2Matthew 3:10-125:227:1913:4017:1518:8-925:41Mark 9:229:439:48-4914:54Luke 3:93:16-179:5417:2922:55John 15:618:1821:9Acts 2:32:1928:2-328:5Hebrews 11:34James 3:5,5:3;  Revelation 8:58:78:810:111:513:1314:1015:2,16:8.
Forest fire
Anticipating objections to some of those, I’d say that there are some occurrences where “fire” is used in a metaphor, but the term “fire” itself isn’t being used as a metaphor for something else (i.e. in a simile where something is “hot like fire”, the fire being referred to isn’t itselfmetaphorical for something else).
2. God’s physical presence is often manifest in some sort of physical fire (at least in appearance) in the Bible:
a. God appears as a fire pot (Genesis 15:17).
b.  Jesus appears as fire in (Exodus 3:2Acts 7:30). I know what you’re thinking.  You’re thinking that the text says “the angel of the Lord”, not Jesus.  Well,they’re the same person.  Secondly, you’re thinking “well, the bush wasn’t burned so it obviously wasn’t physical fire”.  I’d dare suggest that it sure looked like real, physical fire…hence Moses saw it and wondered why the bush wasn’t burned (Exodus 3:3).  The strange thing about the fire wasn’t it’s appearance, but rather that it didn’t burn the bush.
c.  God appeared as a pillar of fire during the Exodus (Exodus 13:21-2214:24,40:38Numbers 9:15-1614:14Deuteronomy 1:33Nehemiah 9:12,9:19Psalm 105:39).  I’d dare say that the fire actually looked like “real” fire.
d.  God appeared as fire on Mount Sinai (Exodus 19:1824:17Deuteronomy 4:11-124:154:334:365:45:22-259:109:1510:4;18:16Isaiah 4:5Hebrews 12:18).
e.  God himself lit the first offering in the tabernacle with fire (Leviticus 9:24).
f.  God himself lit the first offering in the temple with fire (2 Chronicles 7:17:3).
g.  God himself lit David’s offering upon altar on the threshing floor of Ornan the Jebusite (1 Chronicles 21:26).
h.  God’s flaming chariots, pulled by flaming horses, separated Elijah from Elisha as Elijah ascended to Heaven in a whirlwind (2 Kings 2:11).  It’s worth noting that the flaming horses/chariots kept Elisha away from the whirlwind (and the holy ground that it touched down on).  Interesting detail indeed.
i.  Those same flaming chariots and flaming horses appeared a second time in Elisha’s life; when Elisha’s servant had his eyes opened to see the armies of the Lord defending Elisha at Dothan (2 Kings 6:17).  Now arguably, nobody knows if this was actually physical fire, but the fire was described in that way.
j.  In the future, God will defend Israel from their enemies by appearing as (among other things) fire (Isaiah 29:6Revelation 20:9).
k.  The Holy Spirit manifested as seven torches (for the seven churches) in the book of Revelation (Revelation 4:5).  There are questions about the appearance here, but I should point out that this one verse doesn’t exactly overturn the established pattern we’ve seen so far.
3.  God’s judgment is often performed with physical fire:
a. God rained down fire on Sodom and Gomorrah in (Genesis 19:24).
b. The seventh plague in Egypt was one of hail and fire  (Exodus 9:23-24).
c.  God killed Nadab and Abihu with fire (Leviticus 10:2).
d.  God killed some of the complaining Israelites with fire (Numbers 11:1-3).
e. God killed the 250 men offering incense in Korah’s rebellion with fire (Numbers 16:3526:10Psalm 106:18).
f.  God killed the 50 men sent to get Elijah with fire (2 Kings 1:10) twice (2 Kings 1:12).
g.  God killed all Job’s sheep and servants with fire (Job 1:16).
h. God proves himself as God and sentences the prophets of Ba’al to death by raining fire down from Heaven on the altar of Elijah (1 Kings 18:38).
i.  God’s eschatological judgment of sinners/creation will be performed with fire (2 Thessalonians 1:8Hebrews 10:27James 3:62 Peter 3:73:12Jude 1:7Revelation 19:2020:1020:14-1521:8).  Though there most certainly is debate with regards to the physical nature of the fire, the usage of the term “fire” is not clearly metaphorical in the listed passages.  Exploration of this issue is beyond the scope of this post and is, in and of itself, a rather large post.
4.  Fire is used as a relatively wide-ranging metaphor several times in the scripture:
a.  The consuming nature of fire is used as a metaphor for destruction/desolateness, either by God or Men (Numbers 21:2821:30Deuteronomy 9:3Job 20:26Psalm 97:3Isaiah 10:1726:11Jeremiah 48:549:2750:32,51:30Joel 1:19-202:3Obadiah 1:18Micah 1:7Nahum 3:133:15Habakkuk 2:13Revelation 17:16).
b.  The consuming nature of fire is used as a metaphor for God’s jealousy for his own glory and worship (Deuteronomy 4:24Psalm 79:589:46Hebrews 12:29).
c.  Fire is used as a metaphor for God’s judgment/wrath (Deuteronomy 33:2;Psalm 50:378:21Isaiah 30:3031:933:1442:2566:15-16;Jeremiah 4:411:1615:1417:1417:2721:1021:1221:14;Lamentations 2:34:11Ezekiel 5:415:719:1219:1420:47,21:3121:3222:2122:3128:1839:6Hosea 8:14Amos 1:4,1:71:101:121:142:22:55:67:4Zephaniah 1:183:8Zechariah 3:211:1Luke 12:49Jude 1:23Revelation 14:1818:8).  The fire in this metaphor is certainly physical fire.
d.  The consuming nature of fire is used as a metaphor to describe how wealth acquired through bribery doesn’t last (Job 15:34).
e.  The extinguishing of a fire (or candle) is used as a metaphor for the fleeting nature of the life of the wicked (Job 18:5).
f.  The voice/words of the Lord are compared with fire. The idea here is that the voice of the Lord flashes forth and strikes fear (Psalm 29:7) or consumes those who hear it (Jeremiah 5:14)
g.  Fire is used as a metaphor for anger (Psalm 39:3Lamentations 2:4Hosea 7:6).  The idea here is that anger consumes one just like fire consumes that which it burns.
h.  Fire is used as a metaphor for suffering (Psalm 66:12Isaiah 43:2;Lamentations 1:13Zechariah 13:92 Peter 1:7Revelation 3:18).
i.  Fire is used metaphorically to (arguably) describe something that cannot be stopped (Psalm 104:4Jeremiah 20:9Joel 2:5Hebrews 1:7).
j.  The destroying/consuming nature of fire is used as a metaphor for the speech of the wicked (Proverbs 16:27James 3:6).
k.  A lover’s consuming jealousy is compared with fire (Song of Solomon 8:6).
l.  Fire is used as a metaphor for the consuming nature wickedness (Isaiah 9:18,33:1165:5).
m. The consuming nature of fire is used as a metaphor for the tongue of the Lord (Isaiah 30:27).
n.  The illuminating nature of fire is used as a metaphor for wisdom (Isaiah 50:11).
o. God’s word is compared to a fire (Jeremiah 23:29).
p.  Fire is used as a metaphor of impenetrability (Zechariah 2:5).
q.  Fire is used as a metaphor for testing (1 Corinthians 3:133:15).
 r.  Fire is used as a metaphor for the eyes of Christ (Revelation 1:142:18,19:12).
s.  Fire is used as a metaphor for a plague (Revelation 9:17-18).
Wow.  That was a lot of passages!
I guess I do all this work so that you don’t have to…and before anyone complains, I’m sure that I wrongly classified a few references, mostly because of the question of whether “fire” itself was being used as a metaphor or a literal component of a metaphor.  I didn’t spend a ton of time looking at some of the difficult texts, but the pattern is obviously established.
For those that are interested (and I know someone will complain about this if I don’t mention it), I also checked the original languages and the Hebrew word for fire (‘esh) occurs 373 times in the Old Testament (which is actually more occurrences than in the ESV, but mostly because it’s sometimes translated “fiery” or “burning” or something like that), and the Greek (pyr) occurs 73 times (again, more occurrences than in the ESV, for identical reasons).  That works out to 16 more occurrences than the ESV, so on a list of 430 references; that’s a fairly insignificant percentage (3.72%).
Points to take home:
1.  The Spirit (who authored Scripture) never, ever, uses “fire” in a metaphorical sense describing passion/excitement/commitment/fervor etc.  The only metaphorical usages related to emotions are of anger and wrath.  That’s amazingly interesting, given the constant usage of the term in Charismatic circles.  I have rarely heard a Charismatic/Continuationist use the idea of “holy fire” in reference to God’s wrath or anger. I know what you’re thinking though… I know that getting “fired up/being on fire” is an English expression of speech, but that leads to the second point.
2.  The Spirit never, ever, uses “fire” in the context of cultivation of spiritual renewal/fervor/conviction.  There’s never talk of “Holy Fire” in the scriptures, at least in the sense that the phrase is regularly used in charismatic circles.  The phrase doesn’t even appear in the Scriptures at all.
Write it down.
All this talk about “holy fire” isn’t talking about actually burning things, God manifesting his presence in physical fire, divine judgment, or any of the metaphorical uses in scripture.  When people talk about “holy fire”, they’re not talking about God raining down judgment on his enemies.
So, who cares, right?
Well, consider two things:
1.  When a person conflates biblical terminology and idioms with modern terminology and idioms, they twist the scriptures.Twisted
In other words, when a person takes verses like Matthew 3:11 as some sort of teaching that the Holy Spirit will give a person an intense emotional excitement/religious sincerity/fervor for God (or as a promise for the manifestation of sign gifts in a church event/service/meting), one is either mishandling or misunderstanding the scripture.  That’s not a light charge, and people who teach such things will be judged for their error (James 3:1)
But wait!  There’s more!
2.  If you pray for God’s “fire” in your life and experience suffering, God’s giving you exactly what you asked for (Psalm 66:12Isaiah 43:2Lamentations 1:13;Zechariah 13:91 Corinthians 3:133:152 Peter 1:7Revelation 3:18).
If you think God’s not faithfully answering your prayers just because you don’t have an increase in passion or you don’t speak in tongues, you’re sadly mistaken.
Until now, you may have been misinformed and speaking out of an assumed tradition or ignorance, asking God for something you didn’t mean to ask for, and then responded in confusion when he didn’t give you what you meant to ask for (but didn’t actually request).
Now you’re informed, and all your excuses just melted.
God’s far more faithful than we give him credit for, and we’re often a lot more ignorant than we’re willing to admit.
***Please stop talking about the Holy Spirit in language that he never uses of himself.***
Please stop spreading lies about the Holy Spirit.
That’s otherwise known as “blaspheming” (and no, I’m not talking about “the unforgivable sin”…)
If you want more love for God, how about you just ask for more love for God?
If you want more passion, how about you just ask for more passion?
If you want more experiences of tongues, how about you just ask for tongues?
Don’t ask for more “holy fire” in your life; you might get cancer when God answers your prayers.